Is Using Economic Data to Predict the Market a Waste of Time?
More than 40 years ago, if you had made a list of the most influential investors in America, Peter Lynch would have been near the top. From 1977 to 1990 he ran Fidelity's Magellan Fund, and during this span compounded capital at a rate of more than 29 percent.1 He achieved this feat by managing to choose stocks for his fund that turned out to outpace the market as a whole.
Lynch had three things going for him. He ran the fund during an era characterized by tremendous growth (including two significant corrections). He knew that analyzing big economic trends would not enable him to predict what the market would do in the future. And he had the good sense to step down from his role as fund manager while he was still on top.
Lynch had a famous quote about that second item: "If you spend 13 minutes a year on economics, you've wasted 10 minutes."
You might think the opposite of Mr. Lynch’s quote would be true. After all, if you carefully study mountains of data in the leading economic indicators, and note how the market responds each time, when you see those same conditions recur, you can be pretty sure what the market will do. Right?
Unfortunately, this premise sounds so true. And that's what lures so many investors into the belief that they will somehow "crack the code" and be successful at timing the market.
A stock analyst who writes about the market under the penname Courage & Conviction recently looked at how wrong the big-name forecasters have been about the market over the past two years. In 2020 the median forecast for the S&P 500 was for a gain of 7.5 percent. It dropped by more than 19 percent. Stung by that (recency bias), for 2023 the forecasters predicted modest to no growth. The index gained more than 24 percent.
Our anonymous analyst writes, "If highly paid Wall Street economists can't really, at least certainly not on a consistent basis, predict the broader stock market, then why do individual investors pretend that they can?” Courage & Conviction adds that most of these experts have PhDs from leading schools, high IQs, and access to the best information available.
However, you don't need a crystal ball to succeed in investing. Empirical evidence has shown that over longer time periods, the U.S. stock market has been an exceptional place to compound investors' savings and outpace inflation.
Knowing this, a wise investor will have a long-term view when saving for retirement. This means accepting short-term volatility as a normal aspect of participating in the market. We can create a plan for your specific timeline and financial situation, helping to keep you on track when short-term concerns arise.
1. http://go.pardot.com/e/91522/nomics-youve-wasted-10-minutes/94nftl/2203966823/h/o8abYLGKJXauBjl9VriFQUYL66ZU0Mxgnks6YHI1otY
Related articles
Americans, on average, estimate that they would need to make $233,000 per year to feel "financially comfortable" or "secure with their finances." And to be rich and achieve financial freedom, they...
The new Bitcoin ETFs (Exchange Traded Funds) now make it possible to get exposure to the cryptocurrency by proxy through funds that are traded like stocks on various US Stock Exchanges. Previously,...
Late in 2022 the strategy team at Goldman Sachs Research released their forecast for the U.S. stock market in 2023.1 Based on what had happened the year before and on where the economy appeared to be...