In 1992 American political scientist Francis Fukuyama published The End of History and the Last Man. This highly regarded book declared that global politics had reached its final stage. Liberal (in the classical sense) democracy would continue to spread until it was the standard form of government for the nations of the world.1
At the time, with the fall of the Soviet Union and burgeoning democracy movements around the globe, it seemed like Fukuyama was merely stating the obvious. Who wouldn't want a western-style government?
However, with more than thirty years of hindsight, including the war on terror, the resurgence of Russia and China, and a worldwide shift toward greater tribalism, it now seems like history didn't "end" as promised. There have been huge societal changes that Fukuyama's theory simply didn't predict.
It turns out that the end of history illusion doesn't just apply to political scientists. We all suffer from an inability to see ourselves changing substantially from how we are today. About a decade ago, a research team conducted a series of studies where they measured people's perceptions about how much they'd changed in the past versus how much they expected to change in the future.2
For example, a 40-year-old would be asked about the ways they had changed since they were 30. Then they would be asked to predict the ways that they would change as they reached 50. Contrary to logic, participants acknowledged significant transformation from the past, but predicted very little change in the future. We tend to see ourselves as having reached our final point of development and believe that we will remain essentially unchanged in the future. In a sense, we tend to think we're at the end of our own history.
The end of history illusion does have significance for retirement planning. As you think about your post-work years, you need to be sure that you're not just projecting exactly who you are today into the future.
Noted retirement strategist Michael Kitces suggests that, while specific goals are important for saving, you shouldn't lock yourself into a future that won't fit who you are (or might be) in twenty years. What studies suggest, writes Kitces, "is that at a minimum, the way that we save and invest toward retirement (and other) long-term goals should probably be deliberately flexible."
It's not possible to predict exactly who you will be in retirement. There's no way to foresee how unknown future events will shape you. Let us help you explore and plan for the possibilities you dream of, while helping you maintain the flexibility to handle the surprises that life will send your way.
1. http://go.pardot.com/e/91522/wiki-End-of-history/93w42c/2088343657?h=odxMuH5x2xbobEhQJn9VMbqVIe-yHkOsHtadgZu3OT8
2. http://go.pardot.com/e/91522/sion-and-goal-based-investing-/93w42g/2088343657?h=odxMuH5x2xbobEhQJn9VMbqVIe-yHkOsHtadgZu3OT8
For many working people, the ominous feeling begins on Sunday night. They know that when they wake up on Monday, they are going to have to make it through another tough day at work —research says...
When investing for retirement, success is most likely when you give much less attention to the things you have no control over. For example, if you're constantly monitoring the short-term behavior of...
If you want to start a lively discussion among a group of retirement experts, just casually toss out the question, "What's the best age to start taking Social Security?" The reason the answer to...